At first glance, language appears to be a method through which we express our thoughts and feelings. But have you ever wondered if our thoughts and feelings, in turn, are shaped by our language?
Let me give you a few examples.
Think about the word you'd use to describe a man of loose sexual morals. Not many options to choose from, are there? Perhaps you came up with "player", but that doesn't really fit, does it? It also implies a dashing, confident figure at the same point. Now think of a word to describe a woman of loose sexual morals. Bet you have no problems there. Slut. Whore. Tart. Prostitute. No wonder that so many of the female variants have been derived from in order to refer to their male counterparts, such as the "man-slut" or "man-whore".
Speaking of gender roles, there's no word to describe an appreciate for male culture as a countrpart to a Feminist. What would you use? "Masculinist"? The closest thing in common usage is Misogynist, but that's not even close to being accurate, considering that it implies a hatred of women. Speaking of which, what's the term to describe someone who hates males? The closes equivalent is "Femi-nazi", which isn't even a real word, and is a more fitting description of someone who endorses a rigid version of Feminism.
Then we get to the modern media. "Terrorism"? Is it any wonder that when we hear this word, we're confronted with the shocking image of someone hell-bent on destroying our way of life to promote their own perverted ideals? The term "terror" is right there in the word. Yet when the Taliban was fighting the Soviet Union in the 1980s, they were "freedom fighters".
And what of the "War on Terror"? How is it that you declare war on an emotion, anyways? Is President Bush handing out nightlights and sedatives to prevent Americans from being gripped by fear? And if we were to go strictly on the basis of mental health, shouldn't it be "War on Anxiety" or "War on Depression"? I guess "Anxietists" and "Depressionists" doesn't have the same ring to it. Though when you think about it, "Depressionist" is a reasonably accurate term for someone who's attacking America's means of economic well being.
Finally, it's noteworthy that there's no term in the English language that implies a state of balance in which all of your needs are being met, or a term that describes the complete appreciation of a given situation or event. ("Aprovechar" in Italian, for example.) Nirvana? Not English, and it implies a non-physical reality. "Frugality" is close, but implies stinginess. In contrast, there are many words that describe some kind of move towards or away from progress and growth. Growing. Improving. Getting stronger. Weakening. Declining. Fading.
In
1984, author George Orwell used the imaginary language of Newspeak as a metaphor for how language can shape our thought process. In the book, words were systematically and purposefully deleted in order to make human thought and emotion easier to control. A sunset ceased being "beautiful" and became "double-plus-good". I can't help but think that he was on to something there, but I think it's more complex than that. I think the values and beliefs of society influence our language, and that language in turn influences society.
Thoughts?